2018. augusztus 26. vasárnap, 12:42

Veszelszki Ágnes - Cser Nóra (szerk.) 2018: Tudománykommunikáció konferencia. Absztraktkötet. Budapest: BCE MKI.


Allgaier, J., Dunwoody, S., Brossard, D., Lo, Y.-Y., & Peters, H. P. (2013). Journalism and social media as means of observing the contexts of science. BioScience, 63(4), 284–287. doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.8

Bauer, M. (2012). Public attention to science 1820–2010: A "longue durée" picture. In S. Rödder, M. Franzen, & P. Weingart (Eds.), The sciences' media connection—Public communication and its repercussions (pp. 35–57). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Bauer, M., & Bucchi, M. (Eds.). (2007). Journalism, science and society: Science communication between news and public relations. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Borchelt, R., & Nielsen, C. (2014). Public relations in science: Managing the trust portfolio. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 58–69). London, UK: Routledge.

Bucchi, M. (1996). When scientists turn to the public: Alternative routes in science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 375–394. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/5/4/005

Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (Eds.). (2014a). Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (Eds.). (2014b). Science communication research: Themes and challenges. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 1–14). London, UK: Routledge.

Darling, E., Shiffman, D., Cȏté, I., & Drew, J. (2013). The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 32–43. doi:10.4033/iee.2013.6.6.f

Dunwoody, S. (2014). Science journalism: Prospects in the digital age. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 27–39). London, UK: Routledge.

Dunwoody, S., & Ryan, M. (1985). Scientific barriers to the popularization of science in the mass media. Journal of Communication, 35(1), 26–42.

Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e123. doi:10.2196/jmir.2012

Frankel, M. S. (2015). An empirical exploration of scientists' social responsibilities. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2(3), 301–310. doi:10.1080/23299460.2015.1096737

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.

Giberson, K., & Artigas, M. (2007). Oracles of science: Celebrity scientists versus God and religion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Goodell, R. (1977). The visible scientists. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

Hoffman, A. J. (2015). How culture shapes the climate change debate. Stanford, CA: Stanford Briefs.

Holliman, R., Whitelegg, L., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2009). Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: Social communication in the Twitter age. Digital media and society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Nelkin, D. (1987). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York, NY: Freeman.

Peters, H. P. (2013). Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (Suppl. 3), 14102–14109. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212745110

Peters, H. P., Heinrichs, H., Jung, A., Kallfass, M., & Petersen, I. (2008). Medialization of science as a prerequisite of its legitimization and political relevance. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts (pp. 71–92). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Priem, J., Costello, K., & Dzuba, T. (2011). First-year graduate students just wasting time? Prevalence and use of Twitter among scholars. Retrieved from http://jasonpriem.com/self-archived/twitterscholars-poster-abstract.pdf

Rödder, S. (2012). The ambivalence of visible scientists. In S. Rödder, M. Franzen, & P. Weingart (Eds.), The sciences' media connection: Public communication and its repercussions (pp. 155–177). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Rödder, S., Franzen, M., & Weingart, P. (Eds.). (2012). The sciences' media connection: Public communication and its repercussions. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Rödder, S., & Schäfer, M. S. (2010). Repercussion and resistance: An empirical study on the interrelation between science and mass media. Communications, 35(3), 249–267. doi:10.1515/comm.2010.014

Ross, C., Terras, M., Warwick, C., & Welsh, A. (2011). Enabled backchannel: Conference Twitter use by digital humanists. Journal of Documentation, 67(2), 214–237. doi:10.1108/00220411111109449

Schneider, S. H. (1986). Both sides of the fence: The scientist as source and author. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news (pp. 215–222). New York, NY: Free Press.

Shiffman, D. S. (2012). Twitter as a tool for conservation education and outreach: What scientific conferences can do to promote live-tweeting. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(3), 257–262. doi:10.1007/s13412-012-0080-1

van Eperen, L., & Marincola, F. M. (2011). How scientists use social media to communicate their research. Journal of Translational Medicine, 9(199), 1–3. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-9-199

van Noorden, R. (2014). Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126–129.

Walter, Stefanie − Silva-Schmidt, Fenja De − Brüggemann, Michael 2017: From "Knowledge Brokers" to Opinion Makers: How Physical Presence Affected Scientists' Twitter Use During the COP21 Climate Change Conference. International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 570–591 1932–8036/20170005

Weingart, P. (2002). The moment of truth for science: The consequences of the "knowledge society" for society and science. EMBO Reports, 3(8), 703–706. doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kvf165

Zelizer, B. (1993). Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10(3), 219–237. doi:10.1080/15295039309366865